Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Co-crystalization of quercetin and malonic acid using solvent-drop grinding method

Dwi Setyawan , Rachel Olivia Jovita, Muhammad Iqbal, Abhimata Paramanandana, Helmy Yusuf, Maria LAD Lestari

Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia;

For correspondence:-  Dwi Setyawan   Email: dwisetyawan-90@ff.unair.ac.id   Tel:+62315033710

Accepted: 19 May 2018        Published: 30 June 2018

Citation: Setyawan D, Jovita RO, Iqbal M, Paramanandana A, Yusuf H, Lestari ML. Co-crystalization of quercetin and malonic acid using solvent-drop grinding method. Trop J Pharm Res 2018; 17(6):997-1002 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i6.3

© 2018 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the physicochemical properties and in vitro dissolution profile of quercetin-malonic acid co-crystals prepared using solvent-drop grinding method.
Methods: Co-crystallization of quercetin (Q) and malonic acid (MA) in molar ratios of 1:1 (CC1) and 1:2 (CC2) was performed by solvent-drop grinding method with addition of 20 % (w/v) ethanol in a shaker mill run for 30 min. The co-crystal phase was characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), powder x-ray diffractometry (PXRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. In vitro dissolution was performed using the paddle method at 100 rpm in the medium of citrate buffer (pH 5.0 ± 0.05) containing 2.0 % (w/v) sodium lauryl sulfate at 37 ± 0.5 °C.
Results: Thermograms from DSC showed that CC1 and CC2 co-crystals had endothermic peaks at 283.02 and 266.61 °C, respectively. These peaks were in-between the melting points of Ma and Q. The powder diffractogram of CC1 showed new diffraction peaks at 16.21, 19.87, and 28.88 °, while CC2 showed new ones at 16.18, 19.86, and 28.83 °. There were OH- band shifts in IR spectra from 3411 to 3427 cm-1 for CC1, and from 3411 to 3466 cm-1 for CC2. Images from SEM indicate that the crystal habits and morphologies of the co-crystals differed from those of the original components. The dissolution efficiency of CC2 increased 1.056 times relative to pure Q.
Conclusion: Co-crystal phase of Q and MA prepared using solvent-drop grinding (CC1 and CC2) displays physicochemical characteristics different from those of the physical mixtures and their pure components. There is an increase in vitro dissolution as a result of co-crystal formation.

Keywords: Co-crystal, Dissolution, Malonic acid, Quercetin, Solvent-drop grinding

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates