Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparative in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability of commercial amlodipine tablets

Helgi Jung-Cook1 , Lourdes Mayet-Cruz1, Maria Elena Girard-Cuesy2

1Departamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México; 2Investigación, Ciencia y Tecnología (ICT) Internacional, México.

For correspondence:-  Helgi Jung-Cook   Email: helgi@unam.mx

Accepted: 24 August 2018        Published: 30 September 2018

Citation: Jung-Cook H, Mayet-Cruz L, Girard-Cuesy ME. Comparative in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability of commercial amlodipine tablets. Trop J Pharm Res 2018; 17(9):1685-1691 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i9.1

© 2018 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro behavior of amlodipine immediate release products.
Methods: Three Mexican amlodipine products and the innovator (Norvasc®) were evaluated. Three bioequivalence studies were performed in 24 healthy male and female volunteers each. Plasma concentrations were determined using a liquid chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Dissolution profiles were evaluated using USP type apparatus 2 at 75 rpm and 500 mL of HCl 0.1N, pH 4.5 and pH 6.8. Also, the dissolution behavior of different lots of the innovator product was evaluated using apparatus 1 or 2 and 900 mL of buffer pH 6.8.
Results:  All the generic products under study were bioequivalent to the innovator. In vitro data showed that although at pH 1.2 and 4.5, the products met the specifications for very rapidly dissolving products but at pH 6.8, neither the innovator nor the test products complied with the criteria for rapidly dissolving products.  When the study was performed at pH 6.8 in 900 mL of medium, the innovator showed a rapid dissolution behavior.
Conclusion: The results show that the use of WHO conditions (900 mL of media, apparatus 2 at 75 rpm) are more adequate to predict the in vivo behavior of the amlodipine products.

Keywords: Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), Dissolution, Bioequivalence, Solubility, Permeability

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates