Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparative in-vitro studies on the efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal sheep nematode

Isaiah O. Ademola1 , Benjamin O. Fagbemi1, Olakunle S. Idowu2

1Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology,; 2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

For correspondence:-  Isaiah Ademola   Email: adejanet@yahoo.com   Tel:+234-2-8107551

Published: 17 December 2003

Citation: Ademola IO, Fagbemi BO, Idowu OS. Comparative in-vitro studies on the efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal sheep nematode. Trop J Pharm Res 2003; 2(2):235-238 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v2i2.7

© 2003 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose:  This  study  was  designed  to  evaluate  the  relative  efficacy  of  various  brands  of ivermectin injection available for use in clinical veterinary practice in Nigeria.
Method:  Ivermectin  injections  were  evaluated  by  a  larval  development  assay  (LDVA),  using the  larvae  of  Strongyles  (predominantly  Haemonchus  contortus)  of  sheep.  The  effect  of standard  solutions  of  the  drug  from  the  various  brands  on  the  transformation  of  L 1  to  L 3  and survival  of  L 3  larvae  was  used  to  assess  bioactivity.  The  50%  lethal  concentration  (LC50)  was determined  from  regression  line  obtained  by  probit  transformation  of  the  biological  data.  The LC50  values  for  each  of  the  brands  were  compared  with  that  of  the  innovator  brand  (Ivomec Super  ) for any significant difference.
Results:  The  LC50  values  obtained  for  the  five  brands  varied  widely.  It  ranges  from  1.1±0.17 ng/ml  for  the  innovator  brand  to  2.3±0.3,  3.0±0.3,  8.0±0.2  and  17.0±0.3  ng/ml  for  the  other four  brands.  The  biological  assays  performed  on  each  of  the  five  brands  were  of  comparable precision.  LC50  for  Ivomec  super  was  significantly  different  from  those  of  the  other  four brands (Student’ s t test, p < 0.01).
Conclusion:  The  bioactivities  of  brands  of  ivermectin  injections  available  in  Nigeria  are significantly  different.  This  is  a  probable  reason  for  the  varied  treatment  response  to  various brands  of  ivermectin  injection  in  veterinary  practice  in  Nigeria.  This  justifies  the  need  for  drug regulatory  bodies  in  Nigeria  to  ensure  that  ivermectin  injections  registered  for  use  in  Nigeria meets approved standards before the drugs are allowed to be imported into the country.

Keywords: Bioactivity, ivermectin, sheep nematode

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates