Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Determination of optimal dosage of extract of Angelica gigas Nakai against benign prostatic hyperplasia

Jae Seon Kang1,2, Jin Young Lee1

1Department of Pharmacy, Kyungsung University, Busan, Korea; 1Brain Busan 21 plus Research Project Group, Kyungsung University, Busan, Korea;

For correspondence:-  Jin Lee   Email: 0203ruby@hanmail.net   Tel:+82516635962

Accepted: 1 August 2024        Published: 31 August 2024

Citation: Kang JS, Lee JY. Determination of optimal dosage of extract of Angelica gigas Nakai against benign prostatic hyperplasia. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(8):1271-1281 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v23i8.6

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of Angelica gigas Nakai ethanol extract (AGNEX) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) models induced by castration and testosterone propionate (TP) injection.
Methods: 30 rats were randomly divided into six groups of five rats each. One group was used as a normal control (CON) and the other groups were castrated and injected intraperitoneally with TP to induce BPH. Positive control group (PCON) was administered finasteride (5 mg/kg) for 4 weeks and BPH-induced group without treatment was used as negative control (NCON). Groups administered AGNEX (1.25 mg/kg (AG1.25), 5 mg/kg (AG5), or 10 mg/kg (AG10)) instead of finasteride were assigned as study groups. The complete blood cell and lipid profiles, liver and kidney function assays, serum 5α-reductase activity and DHT levels as well as the histological examination of prostate tissues were determined.
Results: The prostate volume of AG10 group decreased by approximately 35 % compared to BPH induced group (NCON). The prostate weight ratio decreased by 10 % in BPH + finasteride group compared to NCON group, and by 24 and 22 % in the AG5 and AG10 groups, respectively. AG10 group exhibited the lowest levels of 5α-reductase and dihydrotestosterone. Histopathological observations of prostate tissue showed normal cell shapes and reduced intraluminal polyp formation in the control and AGNEX-administered groups.
Conclusion: The administration of 10 mg/kg of AGNEX is optimal dose for protective effect against BPH. Therefore, AGNEX has potentials for further investigations as source of lead agents for BPH management.

Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Finasteride, Angelica gigas Nakai, Prostate, Testosterone propionate

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates