Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Efficacy of modified Park’s technique in the treatment of children with strabismus

Yibao Li1, Rui Zhang2, Min Lu1, Yu Su1

1Department of Ophthalmology, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China; 2Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

For correspondence:-  Yu Su   Email: Suyuanhui1@hotmail.com   Tel:+8613399697002

Accepted: 01 November 2023        Published: 30 November 2023

Citation: Li Y, Zhang R, Lu M, Su Y. Efficacy of modified Park’s technique in the treatment of children with strabismus. Trop J Pharm Res 2023; 22(11):2357-2363 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v22i11.16

© 2023 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of modified Park’s technique in children with strabismus.
Methods: A total of 120 patients were recruited in the Department of Ophthalmology, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Anhui, China between January 2019 and December 2021. The patients were divided into study and control groups comprising 60 patients each. Control group underwent rectus muscle adjustment suture using standard incision, while study group received modified Park’s technique, which involved intermuscular membrane incision and conjunctiva two-layer suture method. Various parameters such as perioperative indicators, tear film function, and patient satisfaction were assessed.
Results: The study group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). Also, it showed significantly higher Schirmer’s time, tear film break-up time (TFBUT) time and significantly lower corneal staining score (p < 0.01). Satisfaction level was significantly higher in the study group compared to control group (p < 0.05). So also was clinical efficacy (91.67 %) compared to control group (83.33 %). Furthermore, study group exhibited significantly lower incidence of complications (5) compared to control group (11; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Enhanced Park’s technique improves perioperative indicators, tear film function, and satisfaction level; it also produces high efficacy and lower incidence of complications. This suggests that it might be a viable substitute for conventional treatment of children with exotropia. However, long-term follow-up data will be required to establish the superiority of this treatment strategy.

Keywords: Strabismus, Park’s technique, Intermuscular membrane, Conjunctiva, Two-layer suture

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates