Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of the Suspending Properties of the Co-precipitate of Irvingia gabonesis Gum and Gelatin

Sylvester O Eraga1 , Magnus A Iwuagwu1, Michael U Adikwu2

1Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, PMB 1154, Benin City 300001; 2Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 410001, Nigeria.

For correspondence:-  Sylvester Eraga   Email: eragaso@uniben.edu   Tel:+2348030884928

Received: 7 September 2013        Accepted: 9 March 2014        Published: 26 June 2014

Citation: Eraga SO, Iwuagwu MA, Adikwu MU. Evaluation of the Suspending Properties of the Co-precipitate of Irvingia gabonesis Gum and Gelatin. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(6):843-848 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i6.3

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the suspending properties of the co-precipitate from Irvingia gabonensis gum variety Excelsa (Fam: Irvingiaceae) and gelatin.
Methods: The gum from Irvingia gabonensis was extracted and co-precipitated with gelatin in gum/gelatin ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:0 and 0:1. The suspending ability of the different ratios was evaluated in magnesium trisilicate suspension, and compared with a suspension prepared with Compound Tragacanth Powder BP (CTP) as well as a commercially available magnesium trisilicate suspension (MTS). The parameters tested were sedimentation rate, flow rate, viscosity, and pH. The effect of mono- and divalent electrolytes on the sedimentation rate of the suspensions was also studied.
Results: In terms of suspending ability, co-precipitated gum-gelatin ratio of 1:2 was comparable to CTP while gum-gelatin ratio 1:3 was a superior suspending agent than CTP with regard to the parameters determined. At 2 % w/v concentration, the suspending ability of the suspending agents were in the rank order: 1:4 > 1:3 > 1:2 > CTP > 1:1 > 1:0 > MTS > 0:1. The 1:3 ratio suspensions also exhibited good stability following addition of mono- and divalent electrolytes although there was significant (p > 0.05) reduction in sedimentation volume.
Conclusion: It can be inferred from the results of this investigation that the suspension prepared with the co-precipitate of Irvingia gabonensis gum and gelatin as a suspending agent appears to be superior to those prepared with the gum or gelatin alone as well as MTS.

Keywords: Irvingia gabonensis, Gum, Gelatin, Co-precipitate, Suspending agent, Stability, Magnesium trisilicate, Electrolytes

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates