Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Formulation and In vitro Evaluation of Carvedilol Transdermal Delivery System

Pisipati Aparna1 , Lyadella Divya1, Kalva Bhadrayya2, Chavali VS Subrahmanyam1

1Department of Pharmaceutics, Osmania University, Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad; 2Swaroop Tech Consultancy, Secunderabad, India.

For correspondence:-  Pisipati Aparna   Email: aparna16p@hotmail.com

Received: 10 April 2013        Accepted: 30 June 2013        Published: 23 August 2013

Citation: Aparna P, Divya L, Bhadrayya K, Subrahmanyam CV. Formulation and In vitro Evaluation of Carvedilol Transdermal Delivery System. Trop J Pharm Res 2013; 12(4):461-467 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v12i4.3

© 2013 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and optimize carvedilol transdermal delivery system.
Methods: Solvent casting method was used to prepare patches using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and Eudragit E100 (EE100) polymers, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) penetration enhancer, dibutylphthalate (DBP) plasticizer and Tween 80 surfactant. A 23 factorial design was used based on three variables (PMMA, EE100, DMSO).  at two levels Second order polynomial equations indicating interplay of ingredients were obtained by factorial design using SigmaTech software for 1, 4, 8 and 20 h release data.  so the design was extended to central composite design (CCD). The target formulation was obtained from contour plots and evaluated for various physicochemical parameters. including in-vitro dissolution studies.
Results: Curvature effect was observed in F1 to F8 formulations, highlighting the interplay of ingredients. The interaction term  (X2X3)exhibited highest Sum of Squares SS ratio at 1, 4, and 8 h data with positive coefficients indicating interaction; and so extended to CCD.  From contour plots target formulation, F19, was identified and evaluated. The release data, were subjected to kinetic analysis, which followed Higuchi (diffusion) model (R2 = 0.9886).
Conclusion: F19 yielded release profile nearer to the theoretical predictions with R2 of 0.9888 and followed Higuchi kinetics. Thus, a diffusion-mediated carvedilol matrix patch was successfully developed.

Keywords: Carvedilol, Central composite design, Drug release, Transdermal patch

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates