Odili U Valentine1 , Osemwenkha . Sylvia2, Eke U Esther3, Okeri A Henry4
1Dept, of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin. Benin City; 2Institute of Public Administration & Extension Services, University of Benin, Benin City.; 3Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City.; 4Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.For correspondence:- Odili Valentine Email: vuodili@yahoo.com Tel:+2348023432237
Published: 27 June 2006
Citation: Valentine OU, Sylvia O., Esther EU, Henry OA. Identification of Counterfeit Drugs by Community Pharmacists in Lagos State. Trop J Pharm Res 2006; 5(1):545-550 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v5i1.4
© 2006 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..
Methods: The research instrument was a 23-item questionnaire, which was administered to consenting community pharmacists in 17 out of the 20 Local Government Areas in Lagos State. A convenient sample of practicing community pharmacists both in retail and wholesale distribution of pharmaceutical products were recruited into the study using a list of registered pharmacists from the Association of Community Pharmacists in Lagos State. Effort was made to ensure adequate representation of Pharmacies in every local government area in Lagos State.
Results All the respondents agreed that there is a fake and counterfeit drug problem in Nigeria, and (74%) considered this a major problem. The respondents commonly used visual security techniques before drug purchasing. These were: Seals/embossments (83%), character of print (77%), and Holograms (68%).The respondents’ most likely action after a counterfeit drug encounter was to return the drug back to the supplier.
Conclusion: The study showed that pharmacists sampled were aware of the prevalence of fake and counterfeit drugs and quite a number of them have had encounters with them. There is an indication that the respondents try to assure themselves of the quality of the drugs they purchase by use of several methods. However, no rigorous effort was taken to confirm as well as report suspected fake and counterfeit drugs to regulatory authorities.
Archives
News Updates