Muhammad Usman ,
Mahmood Ahmad,
Asad Ullah Madni,
Naveed Akhtar,
Waheed Asghar,
Muhammad Akhtar,
M Atif,
M Qamar-uz-zaman
Department of Pharmacy, the Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan;
For correspondence:- Muhammad Usman
Email: minhasiub@hotmail.com Tel:092629255243
Received: 24 January 2009
Accepted: 24 April 2009
Published: 14 August 2009
Citation:
Usman M, Ahmad M, Madni AU, Akhtar N, Asghar W, Akhtar M, et al.
In-vivo Kinetics of Silymarin (Milk Thistle) on Healthy Male Volunteers. Trop J Pharm Res 2009; 8(4):311-316
doi:
10.4314/tjpr.v8i4.4
© 2009 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..
Abstract
Purpose: The study was aimed at evaluating the in vivo kinetics of silymarin tablets, a product with anti-hepatotoxic and free radical scavenging activities.
Methods: Silimarin® (Amson Vaccines & Pharma Pvt Ltd) was used as the test product while another silymarin tablet brand, Silliver® (Abbott Laboratories Pak Ltd) was the reference product. The tablets were administered to healthy male volunteers orally at a dose of 200 mg following an overnight fast according to a randomized cross-over design. Scheduled blood samples were collected, centrifuged and the plasma assayed using a sensitive and validated reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method. Various pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on the non-compartmental model.
Results: Non-significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed in the area under the curve (AUC) of the two brands with values of 10.8 ± 0.4 µg h/ml and 11.2 ± 0.7 µg h/ml, respectively. There was, however, a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the Cmax of the two brands. Other pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated did not show any statistical difference (p < 0.05) between the two products except for mean residence time.
Conclusion: The test product can be used as an alternative to the brand, Silliver®-Abbot (reference), only in conditions where maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is not an important consideration.
Keywords: In vivo kinetics, Silymarin, Milk thistle, RP-HPLC, Pharmacokinetics