Gouri Kumar Dash1 ,
Mohd Syafiq Abdullah1,
Suman Acharyya2
1Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Universiti Kuala Lumpur Royal College of Medicine Perak, 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia;
2Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Institute of pharmacy, Tatla, Chakdaha, Nadia-741222, West Bengal, India.
For correspondence:- Gouri Dash
Email: gkdash@rediffmail.com Tel:+0060105491614
Received: 9 September 2013
Accepted: 14 April 2014
Published: 26 June 2014
Citation:
Dash GK, Abdullah MS, Acharyya S.
Pharmacognostic Evaluation of the Bark of Acacia suma Roxb (Fabaceae). Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(6):961-966
doi:
10.4314/tjpr.v13i6.20
© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..
Abstract
Purpose: To undertake the pharmacognostic evaluation of Acacia suma Roxb bark for the purpose of identification and differentiation from related species.
Methods: The macroscopic and microscopic features of the bark were studied, including the use of powder microscopy with the aid of suitable tools and reagents. Physicochemical parameters such as ash values, extractive values and loss on drying were also determined. The bark powder was successively extracted with different solvents followed by preliminary phytochemical screening of the extracts.
Results: Macro- and microscopic studies revealed an outer hard and woody exfoliating old bark consisting of dead elements of secondary bast alternating with tangential strips of compressed cork tissue. The outer layer consists of cork cell with lenticels, followed by phellum, phellogen and pheloderm layers. Concentric rings of secondary phloem tissue alternating with regularly arranged polygonal stone cells and radially traversed medullary rays were present. Preliminary phytochemical screening showed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates, proteins, tannins and phenolic compounds, gums and mucilages, steroids and triterpenoids, saponins and flavonoids in the bark.
Conclusion: The findings of this study will facilitate pharmacognostic standardization of the plant material and aid in the preparation of a herbal monograph for the species.
Keywords: Acacia suma var. Acacia polyacantha, Bark, Pharmacognostic evaluation, Standardization, Phytochemical, Pharmacopoeia