Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Protective effect of evodiamine on acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats through regulation of ROS/ICAM-1/Nrf2 signaling pathway

Sailian Li1 , Zengshu Xing2, Bao Xu1, Xiaoxi Huang1, Jiankang Zhang2, Mengyu Zhang2

1Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical School; 2Department of Urology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Meilan District, Haikou 570208, China.

For correspondence:-  Sailian Li   Email: lisailian2018@126.com   Tel:+86089866151177

Accepted: 13 August 2024        Published: 30 September 2024

Citation: Li S, Xing Z, Xu B, Huang X, Zhang J, Zhang M. Protective effect of evodiamine on acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats through regulation of ROS/ICAM-1/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(9):1459-1465 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v23i9.8

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To study the effect of evodiamine on the signaling pathway of ROS/ICAM-1/Nrf2 in rats with acetic acid-induced stomach ulcers. Methods: The rats were randomly assigned to five groups containing 10 rats each. Prior to acetic acid-induction of gastric ulcers, omeprazole (4.0 mg/kg/day), low-dose evodiamine (L-EVD, 20 mg/kg/day), and high-dose evodiamine (H-EVD, 40 mg/kg/day) were orally administered to the respective groups for 15 days. Following ulcer induction, the same treatments continued for an additional 7 days, for a total treatment duration of 22 days. The control (0.9 % saline) and acetic acid (model) groups were administered 0.9 % sodium chloride solution (10 mL/kg) for the same period. Thereafter, oxidative stress, inflammatory markers, macroscopic and microscopic evaluations were conducted on the gastric mucosa. Results: The acetic acid group showed significantly higher levels of oxidative and inflammatory markers, as well as damage and degeneration of the gastric mucosa when compared to control group (p < 0.05). However, both low-dose and high-dose evodiamine treatment groups demonstrated significant gastric healing. Administration of low-dose and high-dose evodiamine resulted in significantly lower levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1, p < 0.05). Furthermore, evodiamine treatment led to significantly increased levels of glutathione (GSH) and nuclear fact-erythroid factor 2 (Nrf2). Conclusion: Evodiamine reduces oxidative stress, suppresses inflammatory reactions, and exerts an anti-ulcer effect on acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats by modulating ROS/ICAM-1/Nrf2 signaling pathway. More studies into the integration of evodiamine into conventional pharmaceutical treatments for gastric ulcers should be conducted.

Keywords: Evodiamine, Acetic acid, Gastric ulcer, Anti-oxidant, Anti-inflammatory

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates