Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Protective effect of saroglitazar against sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in rats

Duygu Burcu Arda1, Ejder Saylav Bora2 , Mustafa Agah Tekindal3, Oytun Erba?4

1Department of Pediatrics, Taksim Research and Training Hospital Istanbul; 2Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine; 3Department of Basic Medical Sciences Biostatistics, ?zmir Katip Çelebi Un?versity Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Tu?rkiye; 4Biruni University Faculty of Medicine BAMER Laboratories, Istanbul, Tu?rkiye.

For correspondence:-  Ejder Bora   Email: saylavbora@hotmail.com

Received: 12 June 2024        Accepted: 2 November 2024        Published: 29 November 2024

Citation: Arda DB, Bora ES, Tekindal MA, Erba? O. Protective effect of saroglitazar against sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in rats. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(11):1849-1855 doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v23i11.7

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of saroglitazar (a dual-acting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α/γ) agonist in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (S-AKI) using a rat model. Methods: Female Wistar albino rats were divided into control (n = 12), and study group (n = 24; further divided into groups 1 and 2; n = 12 each) following cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) procedure. Control group received normal saline while study group 1 received normal saline and study group 2 received saroglitazar (2 mg/kg/day) intraperitoneally (IP) twice daily for 5 days. Biochemical markers (malondialdehyde (MDA), neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein 7 (IGFBP-7), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), neurolopin-1), histopathology of kidney, as well as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were employed to evaluate renal injury and therapeutic effects. Results: Saroglitazar significantly reduced MDA, TNF-α, NETs, IGFBP-7, BUN, creatinine, NLRP3 and neuropilin-1 (p < 0.05) compared to control group. Histopathological analysis revealed significantly reduced tubular injury and inflammation in the study group compared to control group (p < 0.01) Conclusion: Saroglitazar demonstrates protective and therapeutic effects against S-AKI in rats by reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular damage. Early saroglitazar use in septic patients may be beneficial, and further clinical studies are warranted to establish its efficacy and safety in managing S-AKI.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury, Saroglitazar, Sepsis, Neuropilin-1

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates