Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of alfentanil plus propofol on painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients

Qun Cheng1, Yunping Lan1, Gongmin Yu1, Changxing Xia1, Lu Song2

1Anesthesiology Department, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital; 2Neuroelectrophysiology Department, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou 324000, China.

For correspondence:-  Lu Song   Email: qzsdsl@126.com

Received: 19 September 2023        Accepted: 15 September 2024        Published: 30 October 2024

Citation: Cheng Q, Lan Y, Yu G, Xia C, Song L. Effect of alfentanil plus propofol on painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(10):1669-1676 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v23i10.11

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of alfentanil in combination with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (PGE) in elderly patients. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from 200 elderly patients who underwent PGE at The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China from June 2021 to December 2022. The patients were divided into study (n = 108) and control groups (n = 92). The study group received anesthesia with alfentanil (10 μg/kg) and propofol (1 - 2 mg/kg), while the control group was anesthetized with sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg) combined with propofol (1 - 2 mg/kg). Results: Study group consumed significantly less propofol compared to control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in baseline values of mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood oxygen saturation (BOS), and heart rate (HR) between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, during the examination, the control group showed significantly lower mean values of MAP, BOS, and HR compared to study group (p < 0.05). Additionally, study group experienced significantly shorter recovery time from anesthesia, time to recovery of consciousness, and time to orientation recovery compared to control group (p < 0.05). The incidence of patients rated with excellent or good anesthetic effects was significantly higher in study group compared to control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Alfentanil in combination with propofol offers stable vital signs and superior anesthetic effect in elderly patients undergoing PGE, with fewer adverse reactions compared to sufentanil and propofol combination. Applicability of these findings requires further validation with more data.

Keywords: Alfentanil, Propofol, Elderly patients, Painless gastrointestinal endoscopy

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates