Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

A Comparative Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Conventional and Sustained-release Tablet Formulations of Aceclofenac in Healthy Male Subjects

Santanu Ghosh , B B Barik

University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Orissa.-751004, India;

For correspondence:-  Santanu Ghosh   Email: santanu97@rediffmail.com   Tel:+9282118780

Received: 6 November 2009        Accepted: 11 July 2010        Published: 25 August 2010

Citation: Ghosh S, Barik BB. A Comparative Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Conventional and Sustained-release Tablet Formulations of Aceclofenac in Healthy Male Subjects. Trop J Pharm Res 2010; 9(4):395-399 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v9i4.10

© 2010 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the pharmacokinetics of a formulated aceclofenac sustained release tablet formulation and determine if it is bioequivalent to a commercial brand of aceclofenac immediate release tablet (Zerodol® 100 mg).
Methods: Each of two groups of twelve fasting volunteers received either the reference standard (Zerodol 100 mg tablets) or the test formulation (200 mg aceclofenac) orally once, using a cross-over design with a one week wash-out period. Their blood samples were obtained at regular time intervals over 24 h and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Using the non-compartmental approach, plasma levels of aceclofenac were employed to compute their individual disposition kinetics, including peak plasma concentration (Cmax), peak time (Tmax), area under the plasma level-time curve (AUC 0-t), elimination rate constant (Kel) and elimination half life ( t1/2).
Results: The Cmax values of  11043 ± 3073  ng/ml and 12301 ± 3000 ng /ml were attained in 2.58 ± 1.22 h and 1.29 ± 0.75 h for the test and reference products, respectively, while AUCO- was 45996 ± 10427 and 50253 ± 8283 ng.h/ml, respectively. At 90% confidence interval, the C max, AUC 0-t and AUC0-  values of  the test preparation were 96.4 - 101.3, 100.2 -101.9 and 98.5 - 99.8%, respectively, of the values for the reference. The t1/2 values were found to be 4.50 ± 1.25 and 2.20 ± 2.59 h for the reference and test products.
Conclusion: On the basis of the pharmacokinetic data, it can be said that the test aceclofenac sustained release formulation and the reference product were bioequivalent in some respects. However, the test formulation exhibited a longer elimination half-life (t1/2), thus demonstrating sustained release properties, unlike the reference.

Keywords: Pharmacokinetics; Bioequivalence; Sustained release aceclofenac formulation

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates