Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

The Effect of Polymer Molecular Weight on Citrate Crosslinked Chitosan Films for Site-Specific Delivery of a Non-Polar Drug

Soheyla Honary , Behnam Hoseinzadeh, Payman Shalchian

Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Sari, Iran;

For correspondence:-  Soheyla Honary   Email: shonary@mazums0ac.ir   Tel:00989121452220

Received: 1 June 2010        Accepted: 19 October 2010        Published: 23 December 2010

Citation: Honary S, Hoseinzadeh B, Shalchian P. The Effect of Polymer Molecular Weight on Citrate Crosslinked Chitosan Films for Site-Specific Delivery of a Non-Polar Drug. Trop J Pharm Res 2010; 9(6):525-531 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v9i6.2

© 2010 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop citrate crosslinked chitosan films using chitosan of different molecular weights (MW) in order to achieve site-specific delivery of a model non-polar drug, indomethacin.
Methods: Films prepared with different molecular weights of chitosan and incorporating indomethacin as a non-polar model drug were obtained by a casting/solvent evaporation method. The chitosan films were crosslinked by dipping in varying concentrations of sodium citrate solution and for different crosslinking times. The films were assessed by, amongst others, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dissolution studies and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for surface morphology, drug release and ingredient compatibility, respectively.
Results: Crosslinking time and concentration of crosslinking agent significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the in vitro release of indomethacin as well as swelling of the films. Also, the higher the molecular weight (MW) of chitosan the lower the drug release rate (p < 0.05). Furthermore, film swelling index rose as chitosan MW decreased (p < 0.05). The practical absence of the sharp endothermic peak characteristic of indomethacin in the films suggests that crosslinking may have transformed the drug from the crystalline to the amorphous state.
Conclusion: The citrate-crosslinked chitosan films can be modulated to vary swelling and drug release at pH 3.5 and 6.2; this feature makes them useful tools for designing site-specific delivery systems.

Keywords: Chitosan film, Sodium citrate, Site-specific delivery, Crosslinking, Indomethacin

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates