Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Reverse Phase High Pressure Liquid Chromatogra-phic Determination of Rifampin Quinone and Hydra-zone in Anti-tuberculosis Fixed-Dose Formulations Containing Sodium Ascorbate as Anti-oxidant

P Umapathi , J Ayyappan, Darlin Quine

Department of Analytical Research and Development, Micro Labs Ltd, 67/68-A, Third Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore 560 058, India;

For correspondence:-  P Umapathi   Email: umpy04@yahoo.com   Tel:+918028379197

Received: 11 June 2010        Accepted: 17 October 2010        Published: 23 December 2010

Citation: Umapathi P, Ayyappan J, Quine D. Reverse Phase High Pressure Liquid Chromatogra-phic Determination of Rifampin Quinone and Hydra-zone in Anti-tuberculosis Fixed-Dose Formulations Containing Sodium Ascorbate as Anti-oxidant. Trop J Pharm Res 2010; 9(6):587-593 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v9i6.10

© 2010 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To establish the method for the analysis of rifampin quinone and hydrazone in fixed-dose combination tablets (FDC) containing rifampicin with or without sodium ascorbate as an additive.  
Methods:  The International Pharmacopoeial (IP) method for the estimation of rifampin quinone in FDC was modified. The extraction solvent (methanol/buffer mixture) of the IP method was replaced with ethyl acetate, in order to stabilize rifampin quinone in sample solutions of FDC containing sodium ascorbate as an ingredient.
Results:  Rifampin quinone in FDC samples containing sodium ascorbate, which is not detectable in the IP method, was found to be 1.15 % (4-FDC), 1.52 % (3-FDC) and 1.60 % (2-FDC) using the modified method.  Recovery of rifampin quinone in spiked samples of FDCs was practically nil in IP method whereas the recovery was 99.95%, 99.39 and 99.02 % for 4–FDC, 3-FDC and 2-FDC, respectively.
Conclusion: This modified method was suitable for the determination of rifampin quinone in fixed-dose formulations of rifampin both in the presence and absence of sodium ascorbate. The method is specific, precise, accurate, robust, rugged and gives a linear response for the quantitative estimation of rifampin quinone and hydrazone in fixed-dose combination tablets containing rifampin.

Keywords: Fixed dose combination; Rifampin quinone; Tuberculosis; Sodium ascorbate; Quantitative determination; HPLC

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates