Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Microbial Evaluation of Some Non-sterile Pharmaceutical Preparations Commonly Used in the Egyptian Market

Gamal Fadl M Gad1, Reham A Ibrahem Aly1 , Mohamed S El-din Ashour2

1Microbiology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia; 2Microbiology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Modern Science and Arts University, Cairo, Egypt.

For correspondence:-  Reham Ibrahem Aly   Email: Rehameemicro@yahoo.com   Tel:+020106804684

Received: 5 October 2010        Accepted: 14 May 2011        Published: 20 August 2011

Citation: Gad GF, Ibrahem Aly RA, El-din Ashour MS. Microbial Evaluation of Some Non-sterile Pharmaceutical Preparations Commonly Used in the Egyptian Market. Trop J Pharm Res 2011; 10(4):437-445 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v10i4.9

© 2011 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the type and incidence of predominant microorganisms in certain non-sterile pharmaceuticals immediately after collection and one year later.
Methods: All pharmaceutical samples were subjected to the following examinations: total bacterial count and presence of microbial pathogens, using conventional techniques. Attempts were also made to identify the isolates. The bioburden rate of some of the syrups and oral drops after storage for 0, 6 and 12 months were evaluated in order to assess the effect of storage on microbial contamination level.
Results: Microbial load varied among the pharmaceutical preparations with the highest microbial load in suspensions and the lowest in tablets. Bacterial counts ranged from 10 to more than 103 CFU per ml or g. The bacterial count at 6 and 12 months were significantly different from that at 0 month (p < 0.05). The isolated organisms were either of human flora types, essentially Gram-positive bacteria, or air-borne fungi.
Conclusion: The isolated organisms were either of human flora types, principally, Gram-positive bacteria, or air-borne fungi and the stored preparations lack an effective preservation. Several measures, including equipment automation, monitoring programs and post-marketing surveillanceare required to reduce the level of microbial contamination of non-sterile pharmaceutical products.

Keywords: Microbial contamination, Bacteria, Fungi, Non-sterile pharmaceuticals

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates