Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Investigation of the Genetic Basis of Tetracycline Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from Pakistan

Farhat Ullah1 , Salman Akbar Malik2, Jawad Ahmed3, Farman Ullah1, Syed Majid Shah1, Muhammad Ayaz1, Sajid Hussain1, Lubna Khatoon4

1Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat; 2Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad; 3Khyber Medical University, Peshawar; 4University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

For correspondence:-  Farhat Ullah   Email: farhataziz80@hotmail.com   Tel:+00923339361513

Received: 26 March 2011        Accepted: 13 October 2012        Published: 13 December 2012

Citation: Ullah F, Malik SA, Ahmed J, Ullah F, Shah SM, Ayaz M, et al. Investigation of the Genetic Basis of Tetracycline Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from Pakistan. Trop J Pharm Res 2012; 11(6):925-931 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v11i6.8

© 2012 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence and genetic basis of tetracycline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Methods: One hundred and thirty (130) clinical isolates of S. aureus were collected from Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. Susceptibility to antibiotics (doxycycline, tetracycline and minocycline) was determined by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) evaluated on Muller-Hinton agar as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The tetracycline-resistant strains (TET-R) were screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of four common tetracycline resistance determinants, viz, tet(K), tet(L), tet(M) and tet(O).
Results: Sixty (46.0 %) of these isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) while 70 (54.0 %) were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Seventy four (56.9 %) strains were resistant to tetracycline (TET-R), 30 (23.1 %) to minocycline and 23 (17.7 %) to doxycycline. A majority of the MRSA were resistant to tetracyclines and all the MSSA were sensitive to doxycycline and minocycline. The tet(K) gene was found in 58 isolates and tet(L) in one isolate. No tet(M) and tet(O) were detected.
Conclusion: This study indicates that resistance to tetracyclines is mainly by efflux pumps mediated by tet(K) in S. aureus in northwestern Pakistan.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrobial susceptibility, Antibiotic resistance, Tetracycline, Pakistan

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates