Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of Salt Forms of Chitosan on In Vitro Permeability Enhancement in Intestinal Epithelial Cells (Caco-2)

Thisirak Woraphatphadung, Jariya Kowapradit, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat, Theerasak Rojanarata, Praneet Opanasopit

Pharmaceutical Development of Green Innovations Group (PDGIG), Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand;

For correspondence:-  Praneet Opanasopit   Email: praneet@su.ac.th   Tel:+6634255800

Received: 18 October 2012        Accepted: 28 June 2013        Published: 23 August 2013

Citation: Woraphatphadung T, Kowapradit J, Ngawhirunpat T, Rojanarata T, Opanasopit P. Effect of Salt Forms of Chitosan on In Vitro Permeability Enhancement in Intestinal Epithelial Cells (Caco-2). Trop J Pharm Res 2013; 12(4):495-501 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v12i4.8

© 2013 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of chitosan (CS) salt forms and pH condition on the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of Caco-2 cell monolayer for enhanced permeability.
Methods: Solutions (2 %w/v) of four different salt forms of CS-aspartate (CS-A), CS-ethylene diamine tetraacetate (CS-EDTA), CS-hydroxybenzotriazole (CS-HOBt) and CS-thiamine pyrophosphate (CS-TPP) - were prepared and tested on TEER using fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran 4,400 (FD-4) as the permeant across Caco-2 cell monolayer in both pH 6.2 and 7.4 (physiological pH) environment.
Results: The results show that CS-salt solutions, at pH of 6.2, increased cell permeability in a dose-dependent manner and caused relatively reversible effects only at low doses of 0.001 - 0.010 %w/v. At CS-salt solution concentration of 0.01 %w/v, accumulation of FD-4 in the acceptor compartment was in the rank order: CS-EDTA > CS-TPP > CS-A > CS-HOBt. All CS-salt solutions significantly (p < 0.05) increased the transport of FD-4. On the other hand, at pH 7.4, only CS-EDTA at a concentration of 0.5 %w/v enhanced the transport of FD-4. CS-EDTA was also the most toxic CS salt.
Conclusion: The salt forms of CS are capable of enhancing the transport of FD-4 across Caco-2 cell monolayer, with CS-EDTA the most promising of them.

Keywords: Chitosan salts, Fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran, Transport, Absorption enhancer, Caco-2 cells

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates