Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Quantification of Eurycomanone in Eurycoma longifolia Jack (Simaroubaceae) Extracts and their Commercial Products

Nursyazura Khari, Abdalrahim FA Aisha, Zhari Ismail

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia;

For correspondence:-  Zhari Ismail   Email: zhari@usm.my   Tel:+6046532242

Received: 8 March 2013        Accepted: 19 March 2014        Published: 23 May 2014

Citation: Khari N, Aisha AF, Ismail Z. Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Quantification of Eurycomanone in Eurycoma longifolia Jack (Simaroubaceae) Extracts and their Commercial Products. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(5):801-807 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i5.22

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the determination of eurycomanone in E. longifolia Jack (Simaroubaceae) aqueous root extract and their commercial products.
Methods: Analysis was carried out using reverse phase HPLC at 254 nm and a gradient mobile phase that comprised of acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid. Flow rate was 1 ml/min and separation was done using Phenomenex, Luna C18 column (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm).  Validation tests were performed in order to demonstrate the linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method.
Results: Linearity was in the range 0.1 – 50.0 µg/ml (R2 = 0.9999). Precision, as relative standard deviation of retention time and peak area of reference compound was < 0.14, and < 2.75 %, respectively. Accuracy, as percent recovery of eurycomanone, was in the range 94.2 – 99.8 % while LOD and LOQ were 0.293 ± 0.100 and 0.887 ± 0.300 µg/ml, respectively. Eurycomanone concentration in E. longifolia extracts and commercial products was 0.89 – 3.28, and 0.07 – 0.16 %, respectively. Analysis of the ethanol extract and chloroform sub-extract showed high resolution of > 10 peaks, which indicate the suitability of the method for the analysis of extracts prepared in organic solvents as well.
Conclusion: The proposed method shows good linearity, precision, accuracy and high sensitivity. The method can be applied in the routine quantification of eurycomanone for quality control of E. longifolia extracts and commercial products.

Keywords: Eurycoma longifolia Jack, Tongkat Ali, Eurycomanone, Validation

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates