Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Development and Validation of a Stability-Indicating LC-UV Method for Simultaneous Determination of Ketotifen and Cetirizine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

Prachi V Kabra1 , LVG Nargund1, M S Murthy2

1Nargund College of Pharmacy, Dattatreyanagar, IInd Main, 100ft. Ring Road, BSK IIIrd Stage, Bangalore-560085; 2Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vignan Hills, Deshmuki Village, Pochampally Mdl, Nalgonda District-508284, India.

For correspondence:-  Prachi Kabra   Email: prachi.v.kabra@gmail.com

Received: 15 October 2013        Accepted: 10 May 2014        Published: 25 July 2014

Citation: Kabra PV, Nargund L, Murthy MS. Development and Validation of a Stability-Indicating LC-UV Method for Simultaneous Determination of Ketotifen and Cetirizine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(7):1141-1147 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i7.19

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate stability-indicating reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of ketotifen fumarate and cetirizine dihydrochloride in solid dosage forms.
Methods: Chromatographic separation was achieved on Grace Smart C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) using an isocratic mobile phase that consisted of acetonitrile and 10 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) in a ratio of 45:55 % v/v at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Detection was carried out at 230 nm. Salbutamol sulphate was used as an internal standard. The drugs were exposed to hydrolytic (acid and alkaline), oxidative, reductive and neutral stress conditions, and the stressed samples analyzed by the proposed method. Validation of the method was carried out as per International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) guidelines.
Results: The retention time for ketotifen, salbutamol and cetirizine was 2.05, 5.37 and 6.77 min, respectively. In stress studies, it was observed as cetirizine was more labile in acidic, oxidative and neutral conditions than ketotifen. Both the drugs were found comparatively stable in alkaline, neutral condition and labile in reductive condition. The method was linear in the concentration range of 1 - 30 μg/mL and 10 - 300 μg/mL for ketotifen and cetirizine, respectively.
Conclusion: The developed method is specific and stability-indicating as no interfering peaks of degradants and excipients were observed. Thus, the method is suitable for application in the simultaneous quality control of both drugs.

Keywords: Ketotifen, Cetirizine, Stability indicating method, Stressed conditions, Validation

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates