Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of particle size and diluent type on critical parameters for disintegration of tablets containing croscarmellose sodium as a disintegrant

Prasopchai Tonglairoum, Tanasait Ngawhirunpat, Prasert Akkaramongkolporn, Praneet Opanasopit, Nattawat Nattapulwat

For correspondence:-  Nattawat Nattapulwat   Email: opanasopit_p@su.ac.th   Tel:+6634255800

Received: 15 January 2017        Accepted: 17 May 2017        Published: 29 June 2017

Citation: Tonglairoum P, Ngawhirunpat T, Akkaramongkolporn P, Opanasopit P, Nattapulwat N. Effect of particle size and diluent type on critical parameters for disintegration of tablets containing croscarmellose sodium as a disintegrant. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(6):1215-1221 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i6.2

© 2017 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present work was to determine the effect of particle size and type of diluents on critical concentration for the disintegration of tablet formulations containing a physical binary mixture of a superdisintegrant (croscarmellose sodium, CS) and a diluent.
Methods: The diluents used in this study were microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), dibasic calcium phosphate (DCP) and pregelatinized starch (PGS). Each diluent was divided into 2 different size ranges (small and large size)) and further mixed with 0 - 100 % CS. The binary mixture was compressed at controlled pressure, and the disintegration time and physical characteristic of the tablets were evaluated.
Results: The point of CS concentration that markedly affected the disintegration time of the tablets was recorded as the critical concentration for disintegration. The results showed that the particle size of the diluent did not affect the disintegration time. The critical CS concentrations were 2 % for DCP and MCC tablets and 5 % for PGS tablet. Adding a small amount of CS improved the disintegration of the tablets. However, increasing the amount of CS in the formulation also affected the hardness of the tablets. The particle size of diluents had a significant effect on the critical concentration for tablet disintegration.
Conclusion: Determining the type and appropriate amounts of diluent and disintegrant (percolating component) may be useful in the design of tablet formulations.

Keywords: Disintegration, Percolation threshold, Croscarmellose sodium, Microcrystalline cellulose, Dibasic calcium phosphate, Pre-gelatinized starch

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates