Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparative analysis of hyoscine in wild-type and in vitro-grown Datura innoxia by high performance liquid chromatography

Sidra Siddiqui, Anam Khurshid, Sohaib Roomi, Fazeelat Karamat, Asrar Muhammad Khan, Humaira Shaheen, Tayyaba Yasmin

Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, 54440 Tarlaikalan, Islamabad, Pakistan;

For correspondence:-  Tayyaba Yasmin   Email: tayyaba_yasmin@comsats.edu.pk

Received: 16 December 2016        Accepted: 3 June 2017        Published: 31 July 2017

Citation: Siddiqui S, Khurshid A, Roomi S, Karamat F, Khan AM, Shaheen H, et al. Comparative analysis of hyoscine in wild-type and in vitro-grown Datura innoxia by high performance liquid chromatography. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(7):1683-1692 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i7.29

© 2017 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the hyoscine contents of Datura innoxia plant grown in the wild and that grown in vitro.
Methods: For callus induction from leaf explants, 15 combinations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, gibberellic acid, benzyl amino purine and kinetin were used. For regeneration of shoots, 8 combinations of BAP, kinetin and indole butyric acid (IBA) were tested. Different concentrations of IBA were used for rooting. The hyoscine contents of the wild and in vitro samples was initially identified by TLC and subsequently quantified by high performance liquid chromatography using hyoscine N-butyl bromide as standard.
Results: For callus induction, 2,4-D at 2 mg/L produced maximum calli (96 %). Maximum shoots regeneration was obtained with 2 mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L kinetin. IBA at 0.5 mg/L induced good rooting. Substantial amount of hyoscine was detected in the extracts of in vitro grown plants through TLC and HPLC. Wild root, stem and leaves exhibited higher amounts (approx. 2 µg/mL) of hyoscine than the parts of in vitro grown plants. Green callus grown in vitro contained a maximum concentration of hyoscine (1.01 µg/mL) followed by leaf (0.82 µg/mL) and brown callus (0.432 µg/mL).
Conclusion: The callus cultures of D. innoxia are capable of yielding good amounts of hyoscine, and therefore can be exploited to increase hyoscine production using chemical/hormone treatments on a large scale. Thus, this study provides a sustainable and efficient way for the sustainable production of a natural hyoscine product via in vitro-grown D. innoxia cultures.

Keywords: Datura innoxia, Hyoscine, Callus, Hyoscine, Explant, Gibberellic acid, Benzyl amino purine, Kinetin

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates