Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation of theophylline nanoparticles prepared with dextran-conjugated soy protein

Bei Jin1,2 , Xiaosong Zhou1, Caiyan Chen1, Xiaosa Zhang1, Siqiao Chen1

1School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048; 2Engineering Research Center of Starch and Vegetable Protein Processing, Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.

For correspondence:-  Bei Jin   Email: jinbeikim2013@163.com   Tel:+867593174025

Received: 8 April 2015        Accepted: 6 July 2015        Published: 30 January 2015

Citation: Jin B, Zhou X, Chen C, Zhang X, Chen S. Preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation of theophylline nanoparticles prepared with dextran-conjugated soy protein. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(8):1323-1332 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i8.2

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To design and characterize theophylline nanoparticles synthesized with dextran-conjugated soy protein isolate (SPI), and evaluate their encapsulation capacity and release profile in simulated gastrointestinal media.
Methods: SPI-based nanoparticles were prepared with soy protein-dextran conjugates obtained by titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalysis using a simple ionic gelation method. Formation of the conjugates was monitored spectrophotometrically for free amino group content (A340nm) and by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The particles were characterized by for particle size and morphology, zeta potential, and in vitro release.
Results: Successful glycoconjugation was evidenced by changes in ultraviolet (UV) absorption (A294), browning, free amino group and FT-IR spectra. The particle size and zeta potential of SPI-dextran nanoparticles tended to increase and decrease, respectively, with increasing SPI/dextran mass ratio. Maximum encapsulation and loading efficiencies were around 91.6 and 3.08 %, respectively, which were significantly higher than for SPI nanoparticles. Successful encapsulation of theophylline in the polymeric matrix was confirmed by FT-IR spectra. In addition, SPI-dextran nanoparticles reduced release (p < 0.05) of theophylline in simulated gastric fluid but and enhanced release (p < 0.05) under simulated intestinal condition.
Conclusion: These results suggest that SPI-dextran nanoparticle formulation is an attractive approach to achieve encapsulation and controlled release of bioactive substances.

Keywords: Soy protein, Dextran, Nanoparticles, Encapsulation, Controlled release, Theophylline

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates