Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy in patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Wei Zhang1,2, Lijuan Hu3, Caihong Huang4, Jun Ying1, Naiqing Zhao1

1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health; 2Fudan University Library, Shanghai; 3Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Research Institute of Respiratory Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, 4Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.

For correspondence:-  Naiqing Zhao   Email: nqzhao@fudan.edu.cn   Tel:+862154237485

Accepted: 31 October 2017        Published: 30 November 2017

Citation: Zhang W, Hu L, Huang C, Ying J, Zhao N. Efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy in patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(11):2761-2772 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v16i11.26

© 2017 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKIs) for patients with brain metastases (BM) from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare this treatment modality to chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE (OvidSP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts were searched. Controlled clinical studies that compared the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for NSCLC patients with BM were included in the analysis. Efficacy indicators included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and objective response rate (ORR).
Results: The final sample consisted of 24,637 NSCLC patients with BM from 11 clinical studies. In primary efficacy analysis, it was found that EGFR-TKIs were significantly superior to chemotherapy or radiotherapy in terms of ORR (odds ratio (OR) = 2.10, p = 0.035), OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, p = 0.011) and LPFS (HR = 0.60, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Among the patients with BM from NSCLC, EGFR-TKIs exhibit a therapeutic advantage over chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which is reflected in the elevation of ORR and improvement in OS and LPFS
 

Keywords: Brain metastasis, Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Protein kinase Inhibitors, Epidermal growth factor, Meta-analysis

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates