Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Optimization of purification procedure for horse F(ab´)2 antivenom against Androctonus crassicauda (Scorpion) venom

Azadeh Taherian1 , Mohammad Fazilati2, Ahmad Taghavi Moghadam3, Hamid Tebyanian4

1Department of Biology, Payame Noor University; 2Department of Biochemistry, Payame Noor University, P.O.Box 19395-4697; 3Razi Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Ahwaz Branch, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO); 4Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Disease, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

For correspondence:-  Azadeh Taherian   Email: azadeh.taherian@yahoo.com   Tel:+98 9166098242

Accepted: 25 February 2018        Published: 31 March 2018

Citation: Taherian A, Fazilati M, Moghadam AT, Tebyanian H. Optimization of purification procedure for horse F(ab´)2 antivenom against Androctonus crassicauda (Scorpion) venom. Trop J Pharm Res 2018; 17(3):409-414 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i3.4

© 2018 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To immunize antiserum of horse with Androctonus crassicauda scorpion venom in order to achieve an antivenom with higher purity by combined caprylic acid/ammonium sulfate.
Methods: The optimum pH to terminate enzymatic digestion was evaluated. Purification was performed by various combinations of caprylic acid (0 to 2.5 mL %) and ammonium sulfate (0 to 20 g %) at 25, 30 and 37 ºC. The effects of three factors (caprylic acid, ammonium sulfate and temperature) were evaluated based on precipitation of non-immunoglobulin proteins. Antivenom purity was evaluated by determining the concentration of desired soluble protein and undesired albumin, as well as by turbidity and titration.
Results: The results showed that the optimum pH for inhibition of enzyme activity and precipitation of impurities was 4.8. SDS-PAGE revealed that the highest impurity precipitation and lowest protein aggregation was occurred at  the combination of 1.5 mL % caprylic acid and 10 g % ammonium sulfate at 37 ºC. 
Conclusion: The modified method of purification significantly decreases turbidity, albumin impurity concentration and processing time but increased antibody titer and purity of antivenom. Therefore, it is a potentially suitable method for purifying antivenom in commercial production

Keywords: Antivenom, Scorpion, Androctonus crassicauda, Purification, Albumin, Antiserum

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates