Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of polymer ratio on the quality of a co-processed excipient of prosopis gum and crab shell chitosan

Emmanuel O Olorunsola , Susan G Usungurua

Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria;

For correspondence:-  Emmanuel Olorunsola   Email: olorunsolaeo@yahoo.com   Tel:+2348035067306

Accepted: 11 May 2018        Published: 30 September 2018

Citation: Olorunsola EO, Usungurua SG. Effect of polymer ratio on the quality of a co-processed excipient of prosopis gum and crab shell chitosan. Trop J Pharm Res 2018; 17(9):1693-1699 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i9.2

© 2018 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of polymer ratio on the quality of a novel co-processed excipient of prosopis gum and crab shell chitosan.
Methods: The physicochemical properties (DSC thermogram, powder flow properties, porosity and swelling index as well as pH, viscosity and adhesive strength of 2 % w⁄v dispersions) of prosopis gum, chitosan and the three grades of co-processed excipient of prosopis gum and crab shell chitosan  (Prosochit® 201, Prosochit® 101 and Prosochit® 102) were determined.
Results: The three grades of the co-processed excipient of prosopis gum and crab shell chitosan (Prosochit®) were characterized by one endothermic transition each with peaks at 180 oC, 179 oC and 178 oC for Prosochit®201, Prosochit®101 and Prosochit®102 respectively. Flow properties increased with increase in proportion of chitosan. The porosity of the three grades of the new excipient was not significantly different from that of prosopis gum. Swelling indices of prosopis gum, chitosan, Prosochit® 201, Prosochit® 101 and Prosochit® 102 were 1135.53%, 14.00%, 726.33%, 677.33% and 514.00% respectively. The viscosity also decreased with increase in the proportion of chitosan. The new excipient had higher adhesive strength compared to the individual constituents (prosopis gum and crab shell chitosan).
Conclusion: Prosochit® is superior to its individual constituents as a tableting excipient but its suitability for liquid formulation is reduced by increase in the proportion of chitosan

Keywords: Polymer ratio, Crab shell chitosan, Prosopis gum, Prosochit®

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates