Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Online quality control of panaxatriol saponins percolation extraction using near-infrared technology

Rui-xue Zhong1, Yu-jie Liu2, Jun Wan3, Li-yang Zhu1, Yun-bei Chen1, Hui-min Wen1, Xiao-yun Duan1, Xiao-ling Wang1, Ting-sen Wei1, Chuan-hong Wu1, Guang-fu Feng1

1Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu 610041; 2School of Pharmacy, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610500; 3Life Science & Engineering College of South-west Jiao-tong University, Chengdu 610031, PR China.

For correspondence:-  Guang-fu Feng   Email: fengguangfu65@163.com   Tel:+8618908188545

Accepted: 26 September 2018        Published: 31 October 2018

Citation: Zhong R, Liu Y, Wan J, Zhu L, Chen Y, Wen H, et al. Online quality control of panaxatriol saponins percolation extraction using near-infrared technology. Trop J Pharm Res 2018; 17(10):2055-2060 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i10.23

© 2018 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To establish a new prediction model for online quality control of the percolation extraction of panaxatriol saponins (PTS), viz, ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Re and notoginsenoside R1, from notoginseng by near-infrared (NIR) technology coupled with partial least squares (PLS) analysis.
Methods: Ten batches of PTS (420 samples) were collected and the constituents were determined using HPLC. The NIR spectroscopy of samples was determined using a Fourier-Transform near-infrared spectrometer with an optical fiber transmission PbS detector. Eight sample batches were the calibration set, and two batches were the forecast set. Calibration models were established based on min-max normalization (MMN).
Results: The root mean square errors of cross-validation (RMSECV) of Rg1, Re, and R1 were 0.798, 0.095, and 0.259 mg/mL, respectively. The root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) were 1.110, 0.496, and 0.390 mg/mL, respectively. The correlation coefficients (R2) of cross-validation were 0.9682, 0.9681, and 0.9626, respectively, while the correlation coefficients (R2) of prediction were 0.9831, 0.9198, and 0.9661, respectively.
Conclusion: The results indicate that NIR is a quick and effective tool for online quality control of PTS (ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Re, and notoginsenoside R1) in the percolation extraction process.

Keywords: Online monitoring, Near infrared technology, Panaxatriol saponins, Partial least squares

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates