Nacer Amraoui,
Nozha Mayouf,
Noureddine Charef,
Abderrahmane Baghiani,
Lekhmici Arrar
Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, University Ferhat Abbas Setif 1, Setif 19000 Algeria;
For correspondence:- Lekhmici Arrar
Email: lekharrar@hotmail.com Tel:+213666466220
Accepted: 24 June 2019
Published: 29 July 2019
Citation:
Amraoui N, Mayouf N, Charef N, Baghiani A, Arrar L.
Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activities of methanol extract of Tamus communis L. roots. Trop J Pharm Res 2019; 18(7):1499-1506
doi:
10.4314/tjpr.v18i7.20
© 2019 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiR08;arthritic effects of the methanol extract of Tamus communis roots.
Methods: The total phenolic and flavonoid contents were determined using Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent and aluminium chloride assays, respectively while the antioxidant capacity was determined using DPPH and β-carotene/linoleate tests. For anti-inflammatory activity, carrageenan-induced paw edema in rat was used. Formaldehyde-induced paw edema and adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats were used to evaluate the anti-arthritic effect of the extract.
Results: The total phenolic and flavonoid contents of T. communis showed 55.2 ± 0.036 mg GAE/g dry weight and 1.191 ± 0.002 mg QEq/g dry weight, respectively while the antioxidant activity (DPPH) showed a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50 of 0.128 ± 0.011 mg/mL. Using β-carotene/linoleate assay, the extract showed 88.13 ± 4.03 % inhibition. In carrageenan-induced paw edema in rat, all doses of T. communis did not show inhibition of edema. In contrast, formaldehyde-induced paw edema decreased at the dose of 150 mg/kg days 2 and 4. However, doses of 300 and 600 mg/kg did not show any activity. In adjuvant-induced arthritis, all used doses caused no reduction in arthritic scores and in paw thickness except a significant decrease with the dose 150 mg/kg at the last day.
Conclusion: T. communis extract exhibits high antioxidant activity related to the phenolic compound contents. However, the results of the anti-inflammatory and antiR08;arthritic studies did not support its use in folk medicine in the treatment of rheumatic ailment except on low doses
Keywords: Tamus communis, DPPH, Formaldehyde-induced paw edema, Adjuvant-induced arthritis, Anti-inflammatory, AntiR08;arthritic