Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Isolation, characterization, pharmacological evaluation and in silico modeling of bioactive secondary metabolites from Ziziphus oxyphylla a member of Rhamnaceae family

Irfan Khan1, Muhammad Zahoor1,2, Alam Zeb2, Muhammad Umar Khayam Sahibzada3 , Wasim UI Bari1, Sumaira Naz2

1Department of Chemistry; 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Dir Lower, KPK 18800; 3Department of Pharmacy, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, KPK 25000, Pakistan.

For correspondence:-  Muhammad Sahibzada   Email: umar.sahibzada@gmail.com

Accepted: 24 January 2020        Published: 29 February 2020

Citation: Khan I, Zahoor M, Zeb A, Sahibzada MU, Bari WU, Naz S. Isolation, characterization, pharmacological evaluation and in silico modeling of bioactive secondary metabolites from Ziziphus oxyphylla a member of Rhamnaceae family. Trop J Pharm Res 2020; 19(2):351-359 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v19i2.18

© 2020 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the pharmacological properties of the medicinally active metabolites of Ziziphus oxyphylla.
Methods: Compound I-IV were isolated form the root of Ziziphus oxyphylla (compound I = Stigmasterol, II = Betulinic acid, III = 1,2,3 benzene triol and IV = 5-Pentadecanoic acid). Various spectroscopic techniques were used to identify and characterize the isolated compounds. DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) assays were employed to determine the antioxidant potentials of these compounds. The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibition potential of the isolated compounds were also evaluated.
Results: Amongst the isolated compounds, compound IV was the most potent antioxidant against DPPH and ABTS free radicals, exhibiting half-maximal concentration (IC50) values of 64 and 65 µg/mL, respectively. All the compounds exhibited good inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. However, stigmasterol was more potent than the other isolated compounds, showing IC50 of 85.10 ± 1.45 and 84.81 ± 1.17, respectively, against AChE and BChE.
Conclusion: Although, all isolated compounds inhibited the selected free radicals (DPPH and ABTS) and cholinesterases, stigmasterol and 5-penatadecanoic acid were more potent than other two compounds. Thus the former can potentially be used to treat oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases.

Keywords: Ziziphus oxyphylla, Stigmasterol, 5-Pentadecanoic acid, Antioxidant, Acetyl Cholinesterase, Butyryl cholinesterase

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10. 
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12. 
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6. 
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6. 
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6. 
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6. 
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6. 
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4. 
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4. 
2006; 5: 
1,   2. 
2005; 4: 
1,   2. 
2004; 3: 
1. 
2003; 2: 
1,   2. 
2002; 1: 
1,   2. 

News Updates