Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparison of effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with daily insulin injection in a Chinese population of Type I diabetic patients

Qianqian Yi, Zhiyu Wu, Junhua Dong , Ningning Zhang, Qiuyue Li, Na Gao

Health Management (Screening) Centre, First People’s Hospital of Yichang City, Yichang 443000, Hubei, China;

For correspondence:-  Junhua Dong   Email: 1042925091@qq.com   Tel:+867176222838

Accepted: 17 June 2021        Published: 30 July 2021

Citation: Yi Q, Wu Z, Dong J, Zhang N, Li Q, Gao N. Comparison of effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with daily insulin injection in a Chinese population of Type I diabetic patients. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(7):1517-1522 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i7.27

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy with that of multiple-dose insulin therapy in type 1 diabetic patients.
Methods: A total of 1000 type 1 diabetic patients were assigned to two groups, with 500 patients per group. Patients in group I were treated with continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin (CSII), while those in group II received multiple daily doses of insulin injection. Body mass index (BMI), insulin dose, HbA1c levels, and frequencies of hypoglycemia and diabetic-ketoacidosis (DKA) were determined in each patient at baseline, and at 4-week intervals for 4 years.
Results: The HbA1c levels at baseline and at the end of 4th year in group I were 8.9 ± 1.1 and 8.2 ± 1.5 %, respectively, relative to corresponding values of 8.6 ± 1.2 and 9.1 ± 1.1 %, respectively in group II. The results revealed significant difference in HbA1c between the two groups (p < 0.05). After 4 years of therapy, insulin requirement was markedly higher in group II than at baseline (0.8 ± 0.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.2, p < 0.05) IU/kg/day. However, insulin requirement in group I decreased after 4 years, relative to that at baseline (0.65 ± 0.2 vs 0.8 ± 0.1 IU/kg/day; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: CSII therapy seems to be an effective and safe gold standard method for managing type I diabetes mellitus patients.

Keywords: Type I diabetes, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy, HbA1c, Hypoglycemic events

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates