Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Comparison of gemcitabine/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/cisplatin for the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Wei Wang1, Wenli Li2, Lili Dai3, Lei Zhao2, Kaixin Qu1

1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Funan County People's Hospital, Fuyang, China; 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fuyang Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China; 3Department of Geriatrics, Funan County People's Hospital, Fuyang, China.

For correspondence:-  Kaixin Qu   Email: qukaixin19770418@163.com   Tel:+8617755806231

Accepted: 29 July 2022        Published: 29 August 2022

Citation: Wang W, Li W, Dai L, Zhao L, Qu K. Comparison of gemcitabine/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/cisplatin for the management of non-small cell lung cancer. Trop J Pharm Res 2022; 21(8):1763-1770 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v21i8.25

© 2022 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the comparative efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine/carboplatin and paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with completely resected stage IIa - IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: Sixty eligible NSCLC patients treated in Funan County People's Hospital were enrolled and assigned to two groups by randomization (n = 30 each). One group (CG group) received the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin, while the second group (CP group) received a combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel. Efficacy was assessed based on 2-year progression-free survival, while adverse reactions were recorded to assess the toxicity of the chemotherapy treatments.
Results: No marked difference was found in the 2-year relapse-free survival in the two groups with similar clinical baseline characteristics after follow-up (60 % in CG group vs. 56.67 % in CP group, p = 0.826). Specifically, no significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to incidence of local metastases, distant metastases, or brain tissue metastases within 2 years, and there were no treatment-related deaths. CG group was more likely to develop leukopenia (93.33 % vs. 63.33 % for CP group, p = 0.04), but no significant difference was observed for other adverse effects such as anemia, vomiting, and nausea.
Conclusion: This study shows that adjuvant treatment using carboplatin and gemcitabine produces the same therapeutic efficacy as cisplatin and paclitaxel, but exhibits higher toxicity levels than the latter.

Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, Carboplatin, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, Metastasis, Leukopenia

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates