Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Assessment of antimicrobial resistance risks due to physician and patient practices: An observational study

Pradeep Battula1 , Bhupalam Pradeep Kumar2

1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur, Ananthapuramu; 2Department of Pharmacy Practice, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER) – Autonomous, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

For correspondence:-  Pradeep Battula   Email: doctorbattulapradeep@gmail.com

Received: 17 July 2023        Accepted: 8 October 2024        Published: 30 October 2024

Citation: Battula P, Kumar BP. Assessment of antimicrobial resistance risks due to physician and patient practices: An observational study. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(10):1761-1767 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v23i10.22

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the risk factors for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by examining physician antibiotic prescribing patterns, and patient adherence. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted across two sites. The study involved two components: physician-focused assessment of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and patient-focused assessment of antibiotic adherence. Data were collected from patient records and structured forms, and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with chi-square tests for categorical data. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: The physician-focused study revealed that 40.49 % of antibiotic prescriptions had no indication, and 23.93 % involved drug-drug interactions. The risk of AMR due to inappropriate prescribing was 47.75 %, which decreased to 28.83 % following pharmacist intervention (χ² = 147.61, p < 0.001). In the patient-focused study, 19.52 % of patients were non-adherent to prescribed antibiotics, contributing to an equivalent risk of AMR. A total of 72.67 % of the patients were male, with a mean age of 50.43 years. Most patients (97.5 %) lacked knowledge about AMR. Conclusion: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and patient non-adherence are significant contributors to the development of AMR. Interventions by pharmacists significantly reduce the risk of AMR. The study highlights the need for improved antibiotic stewardship, patient education, and adherence to treatment guidelines to mitigate AMR risk. Locally developed guidelines and shorter antibiotic courses may also help address this growing concern.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Physician practices, Patient practice, Antibiotic prescribing, Pharmacist intervention

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates