Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Beliefs about and adherence to statin therapy among hyperlipidemic patients in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Rania Magadmi1 , Ranya Alawy Ghamri2

1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine,; 2Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

For correspondence:-  Rania Magadmi   Email: rmagadmi@kau.edu.sa   Tel:+966-557700135

Received: 20 September 2024        Accepted: 5 December 2024        Published: 30 December 2024

Citation: Magadmi R, Ghamri RA. Beliefs about and adherence to statin therapy among hyperlipidemic patients in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(12):2107-2116 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v23i12.16

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess patients' beliefs about the necessity and safety of statins and their impact on adherence in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 150 hyperlipidemic patients undergoing statin therapy for at least six months. A structured questionnaire was used to assess sociodemographic data, statin adherence and beliefs about statin necessity and safety using a 5-level Likert scale. Results: Over 40 % of participants were nonadherent by missing seven or more doses in the past month, 26.7 % often forgot medication when traveling and 45.3 % perceived themselves as noncompliant. The main noncompliance reasons were forgetfulness (28.0 %), perceived cholesterol control (14.7 %) and side effects like muscle aches (10.3 %). Less than 25 % agreed on statin necessity for health, with 45.0 % unsure. Higher belief scores correlated with longer statin use and fewer missed doses. About 27.0 % were concerned about adverse effects, but concerns showed no consistent effect on adherence. Conclusion: Hyperlipidemic patients in Jeddah exhibit inadequate adherence to statin therapy, primarily due to forgetfulness, concerns about transporting medication and varying beliefs regarding the necessity and potential adverse effects of statins. These findings underscore the critical need for targeted educational interventions and enhancement of clinical practices.

Keywords: Adherence, Beliefs, Hyperlipidemia, Patient perception, Saudi Arabia, Statins

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates