Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of the California mastitis test, pH and milk colour as indicators for subclinical mastitis detection in local dairy cows

Ramzi Amran , Ahmad Alhimaidi, Aiman Ammari

Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia;

For correspondence:-  Ramzi Amran   Email: ramran@ksu.edu.sa

Received: 19 October 2024        Accepted: 13 January 2025        Published: 27 January 2025

Citation: Amran R, Alhimaidi A, Ammari A. Evaluation of the California mastitis test, pH and milk colour as indicators for subclinical mastitis detection in local dairy cows. Trop J Pharm Res 2025; 24(1):15-20 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v24i1.3

© 2025 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the utilization of diagnostic tools such as the California Mastitis Test (CMT) and milk pH and colour assessments for detecting subclinical mastitis (SCM). Method: A total of 60 milk samples were collected from 60 apparently healthy local dairy cows in Dhamar City, Yemen, to investigate the incidence of SCM. The samples were subjected to California Mastitis Test (CMT) as well as tests for pH and colour. Results: According to CMT results, 45 % of the cows had SCM. The rate of prevalence in (+), (++) and (+++) CMT results was 17 (28 %), 7 (12 %) and 3 (5 %), respectively. In terms of milk pH, 27 (45 %) of the samples had a pH between 6.6 and 6.8, indicating no signs of SCM. However, 20 (33 %) of the samples exhibited a pH < 6.6, reflecting increased acidity, while 13 (22 %) had a pH > 6.8, indicating alkaline milk, a marker of severe inflammation and tissue damage. The assessment of milk colour showed that 34 (57 %) of the samples had normal white milk, indicating no mastitis, while 17 (28 %) were yellow, suggesting mild to moderate inflammation or infection. Finally, 9 (15 %) of the samples were pink, indicating the presence of blood and severe inflammation with udder damage. Conclusion: These findings underscore the reliability of CMT, pH and milk colour assessments as effective diagnostic tools for detecting SCM in dairy cows, thus providing valuable insights for early intervention and management strategies.

Keywords: Mastitis, Milk, California test, pH, Cows

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2025; 24: 
1
2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates