Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Qualitative assessment of the pharmacist’s role in Punjab, Pakistan: Medical practitioners’ views

Saira Azhar1 , Mohammad Azmi Hassali2, Ayesha Iqbal1, Muhammad Rouf Akram3, Mufti Attique-Ur-Rehman3, Sabiha Karim4, Imran Tariq4, Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin Asad1, Ismail Tarjik5, Ghulam Murtaza1

1Department of Pharmacy, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan; 2Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia; 3Department of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha; 4University College of Pharmacy, University of Punjab, Lahore; 5Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.

For correspondence:-  Saira Azhar   Email: drsairaazhar@gmail.com   Tel:+23142082826

Received: 8 October 2014        Revised: 29 December 2014        Published: 28 February 2015

Citation: Azhar S, Azmi Hassali M, Iqbal A, Rouf Akram M, Attique-Ur-Rehman M, Karim S, et al. Qualitative assessment of the pharmacist’s role in Punjab, Pakistan: Medical practitioners’ views. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(2):323-327 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i2.19

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the perception of Pakistani doctors regarding pharmacist’s role in Punjab Pakistan.
Methods: A qualitative approach was used to assess the perception of doctors regarding pharmacist’s role in the study setting. A total of 12 doctors were interviewed using a semi- structured interview guide. The study was conducted for a period of 3 months in the Pakistani cities of Islamabad and Lahore, from July to September 2011. Doctors were informed regarding the aim, objective and nature of the study.
Results: All the interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed for their content. Thematic content analysis yielded four major themes: 1) Availability of pharmacist in Pakistan’s healthcare setting.  2) Willingness to collaborate with pharmacist. 3) Separation of prescribing from dispensing.  4) Difference in academic levels of doctors and pharmacist.
Conclusion: Doctors are receptive to an expanded role for pharmacists, also regard them as drug information experts, but their expectations fall short of the quality of clinically-focused pharmacy services that pharmacists are actually rendering.

Keywords: Doctors’ expectation, Pharmacist, Clinical pharmacy services, Qualitative study, Prescribing

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.6 (2023)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 49 (2023)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates