Indexed by Science Citation Index (SciSearch), International Pharmaceutical Abstract, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, Index Copernicus, EBSCO, African Index Medicus, JournalSeek, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), African Journal Online, Bioline International, Open-J-Gate

ISSN: 1596-5996 (print); 1596-9827 (electronic)-


Home | Back Issues | Current Issue | Review manuscript | Submit manuscript

 
 

This Article

 

Abstract

 

Full-Text (PDF)

 

Table of contents

 

Comments

 

Letters

 

Comments to Editor

 

e-mail Alert

 

Sign Up

 

Research Article


 

Preparation of Mucoadhesive Patches for Buccal Administration of Metoprolol Succinate: In Vitro and In Vivo Drug Release and Bioadhesion

 

Navneet Verma1,2* and Pronobesh Chattopadhyay3

1College of Pharmacy, IFTM University, Moradabad-244001 (U.P.), 2Institute of Pharmacy, Bhagwant University, Ajmer-305004 (Raj.), 3Defence Research Laboratory, Tejpur-784001 (Assam), India

 

For correspondence: Email: navneet28jan@yahoo.com  Tel: +91-9917731198

 

Received: 15 May 2011                                                                Revised accepted: 14 December 2011

 

Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, February 2012; 11(1): 9-17

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v11i1.2  

Abstract

 

Purpose: To develop mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of metoprolol succinate and to evaluate their in vitro and in vivo bioadhesion.

Methods: The mucoadhesive buccal patches were prepared by solvent casting technique using two different mucoadhesive polymers. The formulations were tested for in vitro drug permeation studies, buccal absorption, in vitro drug release studies, moisture absorption as well as for in vitro and in vivo bioadhesion.

Results: The peak detachment force and work of adhesion for MC5 (sodium carboxymethylcellulose, i.e., Na CMC) patch were 0.87 N and 0.451 mJ respectively and the corresponding values for CH5 (chitosan) were 5.15N and 0.987 mJ. Formulation CH5 (prepared with chitosan) showed 67.1 % release, while MC5 (Na CMC) showed drug release of 81.9 % in 6 h. Basic pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, Tmax and AUCtotal varied statistically (p < 0.05) when given by the buccal route compared with that of the solution given by the oral route.

Conclusion: The results indicate that formulation of suitable bioadhesive buccal patches with the desired permeability is feasible. The development of bioadhesive buccal formulation for metoprolol succinate with a lower dose and few side effects may be attainable.

 

Keywords: Mucoadhesive, Buccal patches, Metoprolol succinate, Sodium carboxymethylcellulose, Chitosan, Bioavailability.  

Copyright@2002-2010. Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City. All rights reserved.

Powered by Poracom E-mail: jmanager@poracom.net