Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Indexed by Science Citation Index (SciSearch), International Pharmaceutical Abstract, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, Index Copernicus, EBSCO, African Index Medicus, JournalSeek, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), African Journal Online, Bioline International, Open-J-Gate

ISSN: 1596-5996 (print); 1596-9827 (electronic)-

Home | Back Issues | Current Issue | Review manuscript | Submit manuscript


	This Article
	Abstract
	Full-Text (PDF)
	Table of contents
	Comments
	Letters
	Comments to Editor

	e-mail Alert
	Sign Up

Research Article

Evidence for Enhanced Intestinal Absorption of Digoxin by P-Glycoprotein Inhibitors

Hadi Valizadeh¹, Maryam Mehtari² and Parvin Zakeri-Milani³*

¹Research Center for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, ²Drug Applied Research Center, ³Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

*For correspondence: Email: pzakeri@tbzmed.ac.ir Tel: +98 (411) 339-2593; Fax: +98 (411) 334-4798

Received: 11 April 2011 Revised accepted: 19 October 2012

Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, December 2012; 11(6): 939-945

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v11i6.10

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the influence of macrolides as P-glycoprotein inhibitors on the level of intestinal absorption of digoxin.

Methods: Jejunal segments of anaesthetized rats were cannulated and perfused by digoxin in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C in the presence or absence of macrolides (erythromycin and clarithromycin). Samples were obtained from outlet tubing at different time points and digoxin concentration assayed. The effective permeability of the drug was calculated after analyzing the samples using reverse-phase HPLC method.

Results: Digoxin effective permeability was in the range of 0.24 ± 0.02 ×10^-4 to 0.32 ± 0.06 ×10^-4 cm/sec for the control group. The macrolides significantly (p < 0.05) increased intestinal transport of digoxin, with digoxin in the presence of 150 μM of each macrolide in the range 0.42 ± 0.08 ×10^-4 to 0.52 ± 0.07 ×10^-4 cm/sec. However, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between the effects of the two macrolides.

Conclusion: The probable explanation for digoxin-macrolide interaction is inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux of digoxin which leads to increased digoxin intestinal absorption.

Keywords: Digoxin, Macrolides, Efflux, Intestinal permeability, P-glycoprotein