|
Original Research Article
Development of Three
Methods for Simultaneous Quantitative Determination of
Chlorpheniramine Maleate and Dexamethasone in the
Presence of Parabens in Oral Liquids
Hany W Darwish1,2*,
Fadia H Metwally2,3 and Abdelaziz El Bayoumi2
1Department of Pharmaceutical
Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, PO
Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia, 2Department
of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo
University, Kasr El-Aini Street, ET 11562, Cairo, Egypt,
3Ibn Sina National College for Medical
Studies, AlMahjer Road, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
*For correspondence:
Email: hdarwish75@yahoo.com,
hdarwish@ksu.edu.sa; Tel: +966-14677343; Fax:
+966-14676220
Received: 22 October 2014
Revised accepted: 18
December 2014
Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research,
January 2015;
14(1): 1 53-161
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v14i1.22
Abstract
Purpose: To develop new selective,
precise, and accurate methods for the simultaneous
determination of chlorpheniramine maleate (CHP) and
dexamethasone (DX) in the presence of methyl and propyl
paraben in phenadone syrup.
Methods: In the first two methods,
the predictive abilities of principal component
regression (PCR) and partial least squares (PLS),
respectively, were examined for the analysis of the
quaternary mixture. The third method, high performance
thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)-densitometric method,
was based on the separation of the mixture on silica gel
plates using chloroform: methanol (93:7, v/v) as a
mobile phase.
Results: All the proposed methods
were successfully applied to the analysis of raw
materials and dosage form. For PCR method, recovery of
chlorpheniramine maleate and dexamethasone in the dosage
form was 98.89 ± 1.736 and 102.36 ± 1.86 %, respectively
while for. PLS method, recovery of chlorpheniramine
maleate and dexamethasone was 98.94 ± 1.69 and 102.33
±1.84, respectively. On the other hand, recovery of the
two analytes by HPTLC method was 100.72 ± 1.05 and
102.29 ± 3.98, respectively. The results obtained by
applying the proposed methods were statistically
analyzed and compared with those obtained by a reported
HPLC method.
Conclusion: The proposed methods are
fast, accurate and specific, and can be applied for the
quantitative determination of the two analytes without
interference from added excipient, thus obviating the
need for preliminary extraction of analytes from the
pharmaceutical formulation. Thus, they are suitable for
use in quality control (QC) laboratories and
pharmaceutical industry
Keywords: Chlorpheniramine maleate,
Dexamethasone, Principal component regression, Partial
least squares, High performance thin layer
chromatography, Excipients |