Indexed by Science Citation Index (SciSearch), International Pharmaceutical Abstract, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, Index Copernicus, EBSCO, African Index Medicus, JournalSeek, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), African Journal Online, Bioline International, Open-J-Gate

ISSN: 1596-5996 (print); 1596-9827 (electronic)-


Home | Back Issues | Current Issue | Review manuscript | Submit manuscript

 
 

This Article

 

Abstract

 

Full-Text (PDF)

 

Table of contents

 

Comments

 

Letters

 

Comments to Editor

 

e-mail Alert

 

Sign Up

 

Original Research Article


Chinese Herbal Medicines – Comparison of Doses Prescribed in Clinical Practice and those in China Pharmacopeia

 

Sheng-Lou Ni1, Chuan-Rong Chen1, Yan-Ling Fu2*, Lin Zhang1 and Jia Song1

1School of Basic Medical Sciences, 2School of Continuing Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Beijing 100029, China

 

*For correspondence: Email: fuyanlingbucm@126.com; Tel: (+86) 10-6428-6307; Fax: (+86) 10-6422-0858

 

Received: 20 Sepember 2014                            Revised accepted: 13 December 2014

 

Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, January 2015; 14(1): 171-177

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v14i1.24   

Abstract

 

Purpose: To compare the optimum doses of frequently used Chinese herbal medicines in clinical practice with stipulated doses in China Pharmacopoeia 2010, and assess the factors influencing choice of dose.

Methods: A total of 303 practitioners of traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) from 50 comprehensive TCM hospitals were investigated using a multi-stage randomized questionnaire. The content of the questionnaire included doses of frequently-used Chinese herbs, cognition of current doses in clinical practice, and doctors’ (practitioners’) opinions on dose levels. The median of Chinese herbal medicines’ dose prescribed by the participants was compared with the upper limit value (ULV) of stipulated doses in China Pharmacopoeia by assigned rank test. The centralized tendency of dose selection by TCM doctors was expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The top three factors influencing selection of dose were obtained using inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: Among the selected Chinese herbs, the doses of 32 herbs exceeded ULV of the pharmacopoeia, accounting for 57.14 % (32/56). The top three factors influencing dose choice were variety and quality of the herbs, mode of preparation, and herbal combination. Furthermore, due to varying quality of the medicinal materials, method of preparation, and clinical experience, the doses among the 303 TCM doctors also varied considerably.

Conclusion: There is a significant difference between the doses of herbal medicines prescribed by TCM doctors and the doses stipulated in China Pharmacopoeia. In most cases, the former doses are higher.

 

Keywords: Chinese herbal medicines, China Pharmacopoeia, Dose selection, Multi-stage randomized questionnaire

Copyright@2002-2010. Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City. All rights reserved.

Powered by Poracom E-mail: jmanager@poracom.net