Leishmaniasis, caused by
protozoan Leishmania parasites and transmitted
via infected female sand flies and possible reservoir
hosts, like dogs, is endemic in 88 countries and 350
million people are at risk of contracting the disease.
Leishmaniasis prevalence is >12 million cases/year and
the incidence is >2.5 million cases/year. The estimated
disease burden is 2.4 million DALYs. Leishmaniasis is a
category 1 disease (“emerging or uncontrolled
diseases”). The World Health Organization has
acknowledged it as a severely neglected disease and
urged intensified research programmes to improve vector
control, diagnostics and therapeutic arsenal to contain
further incidence and morbidity1.
An infection with
Leishmania
parasites can, depending on the infecting species, give
rise to several distinct clinical manifestations,
ranging from localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) with
single to multiple skin ulcers, satellite lesions or
nodular lymphangitis or possibly mucosal involvement,
muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), to systemic visceral
leishmaniasis (VL) with involvement of different organs
(like liver and spleen) and bone marrow, which may be
lethal.
Early
diagnosis and correct identification of the infecting
parasite species causing disease are crucial to install
effective treatment, as pathology and treatment are
different depending on the infecting (sub-)species, and
remain problematic2.
Traditionally, the diagnosis of leishmaniasis is based on clinical
criteria and, in the best case, supported by
conventional laboratory diagnosis, such as microscopical
demonstration or culturing of Leishmania
parasites from skin biopsies or aspirates from lesions,
bone marrow, lymph node or spleen. However, these
methods are rather insensitive, sometimes painful or
even dangerous for the patient and culturing of
parasites is time-consuming and laborious2.
There is thus an urgent need to enhance the diagnostic
arsenal for this disease, but only few initiatives are
focusing on the improvement of leishmaniasis diagnosis
and funding is limited. Although molecular biology and
genomics have proven to provide, or are promising to
deliver, many answers to health problems, including
diagnosis, in the industrialized countries, these
developments do not translate into useful tools for
developing countries3. A major obstacle
preventing the implementation of these innovative tools
is the fact that they rely on a constant supply of
electricity and require investment in expensive
equipment, which often needs dedicated maintenance. An
innovative EU sponsored research consortium, Human
African Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis
Diagnogstics (TRYLEIDIAG; see: www.tryleidiag.org),
in which research groups from Europe and disease endemic
countries in Africa, strives towards the development of
simplified molecular-based diagnostic tests that
circumvent the use of sophisticated equipment and
electricity. The TRYLEIDIAG consortium exploits a
combination of simplified amplification methods, like
for example nucleic acid sequence based amplification
technology, with easy read-out systems, like oligo-chromatography,
which are promising sensitive and specific diagnostic
tools for kinetoplastid disease. However, the
implementation of such a tool in primary health care may
be hampered due to relative high cost of the test. A
test costing over $1 is not affordable for communities
able to spend less this than amount of money per person
on primary health care per day.
After diagnosis, adequate treatment must be installed promptly. Here we
meet another challenge in leishmaniasis control. A wide
variety of treatment modalities exist for the diverse
spectrum of clinical disease. Traditional anti-leishmanial
systemic agents such as antimonials, pentamidine and
amphotericin are limited by toxic side effects,
parenteral route of administration and emerging drug
resistance1,4. The latter is for example
evident in India where sodium stibogluconate, once
considered to be the standard first line drug for VL,
has lost its efficacy because of the development of high
resistance (>50%). Newer agents, such as liposomal
amphotericin B (Ambisome) or oral miltefosine (Impavido),
have shown efficacy and tolerability. However, daily use
of these new pharmaco-therapies remains limited by their
high cost in developing countries and despite advances
in basic scientific research, there has been little
progress in new drug development for what remains a
neglected disease; but luckily there are some
exceptions. The drugs for neglected diseases initiative
(www.DNDI.org)
is developing drugs for neglected diseases on a
not-for-profit basis. A recent success of DNDI is
Paromomycin (aminosidine), a low-cost parenteral
formulation, which was registered in late 2006 in India
and is currently in Phase III trials in East Africa.
Recently, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has joint DNDI in a
collaborative research effort targeting neglected
tropical diseases which disproportionately affect the
developing world and it is hope that
this program will provide innovative projects yielding
new drugs against leishmaniasis and other neglected
diseases.
The challenge to improve the diagnosis of leishmaniasis and subsequent
adequate treatment of the disease remains at this
moment. It is a task of the scientific community to
prioritize and conduct research towards this issue, but
it is a duty of policy makers to place this high on the
international research agenda and the obligation of
international donors to secure funding for research and
implementation of innovative diagnostics and new drugs
in primary health care systems in developing countries.
The best diagnostics and treatment options must be made
available for those at need at all levels in society. We
cannot afford to neglect diseases.
References
1.
Desjeux P. Leishmaniasis: current situation and new
perspectives. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
2004; 27(5): 305-318.
2.
Faber WR, et
al. Value of diagnostic techniques for cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.
2003; 49(1):
70-74.
3.
Daar AS, et
al. How can developing countries harness
biotechnology to improve health? BMC Public Health 2007; 7:
436.
4.
Mishra J, et
al. Chemotherapy of leishmaniasis: pas, present
and future. Curr. Med. Chem 2007; 14(10): 1153-1169.